|
|
AUGUST 2004
|
PERMANENT RESIDENT CARD - REVISITED
Since June 28, 2002, all new permanent residents
automatically receive Permanent Resident Cards ("PR Card") within
approximately four weeks of their arrival at the port of entry as
immigrants. Replacing the former Record of Landing (IMM 1000), which
was subject to forging and counterfeiting in the past, the new
wallet-sized card is a secure, machine readable and fraud-resistant
document.
The cost of the PR Card is incorporated in the
overall fee for an application for permanent residence. The PR Card
is valid for five years from the date of issue. As of January 2004,
permanent residents, including children, travelling outside Canada
need to prove their status in order to return to Canada on a
commercial carrier (airplane, boat, train or bus). The PR Card is
now the required method for doing so.
The PR Card will be revoked by Citizenship and
Immigration Canada ("CIC") if: i) the card is lost or stolen; ii)
the permanent resident becomes a Canadian citizen; or iii) the
person loses permanent residence status.
Permanent residents in Canada whose PR Cards have
been lost, stolen, destroyed or who never received a card should
contact the PR Card Call Centre.
Permanent residents outside of Canada who have lost
their cards need to apply for travel documents so they can re-enter
Canada. They must complete an Application for a Travel
Document-Permanent Resident Abroad and submit it in person at the
nearest Canadian visa office or they may mail it to a Canadian visa
office at the location to which they will be travelling. A list of
the Canadian visa offices that issue temporary travel documents is
available at www.cic.gc.ca.
Before a travel document is issued, the applicant
must satisfy an immigration officer that they meet the residency
obligations. The applicant also needs to prove their identity and
permanent resident status. Decisions on whether a permanent resident
has complied with their residency requirements may be made abroad,
at a port of entry or in Canada. These decisions may be appealed to
the Immigration Appeal Division ("IAD") of the Immigration and
Refugee Board.
If a permanent resident with a PR Card becomes a
Canadian citizen, CIC automatically revokes the PR Card as part of
the citizenship application process. This person would then need to
obtain a Canadian passport for international travel.
In the event that a permanent resident fails to
satisfy the residency requirements while in Canada, they may lose
their permanent resident status. CIC officers may issue a removal
order requiring that the concerned person depart from Canada. Such
decisions may be appealed to the IAD within 30 days of receipt of a
non-compliance notification.
When a permanent resident no longer meets the
residency requirements while outside Canada, CIC officers may send a
letter notifying them that they have failed to comply with their
residency obligations. Such decisions may be appealed to the IAD
within 60 days of the receipt of a non-compliance notification. In
some cases, permanent residents who receive such notifications may
be issued a temporary travel document to return to Canada to attend
their appeal hearing.
IAD hearings operate as in a regular court and are
held in public. However, rules of evidence are applied less strictly
and the IAD may consider any evidence that it believes is credible
and trustworthy. When rendering a decision, IAD members consider
questions of law and fact and, in some circumstances, humanitarian
and compassionate grounds.
ARRANGED EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR MARKET OPINIONS
Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection
Act ("IRPA") and the Immigration and Refugee Protection
Regulations ("Regulations"), which came into effect on June 28,
2002, there are special cases when employers are required to apply
for an "opinion" from Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
("HRSDC") in order to hire a foreign national and facilitate their
entry with Citizenship and Immigration Canada ("CIC"). The two types
of opinions are an Arranged Employment Opinion ("AEO") and a Labour
Market Opinion ("LMO").
Section 82(2)(c) of the Regulations sets out the
conditions that must be met in order to apply for an Arranged
Employment Opinion: "the skilled worker does not intend to work in
Canada before being issued a permanent resident visa and does not
hold a work permit and (i) the employer has made an offer to employ
the skilled worker on an indeterminate basis once the permanent
resident visa is issued to the skilled worker, and (ii) an officer
has approved that offer of employment based on an opinion provided
to the officer by HRSDC at the request of the employer or an officer
that (A) the offer of employment is genuine, (B) the employment is
not part-time or seasonal employment, and (C) the wages and working
conditions of the employment would be sufficient to attract and
retain Canadian citizens."
A positive HRSDC AEO supports the permanent
residence application of a Skilled Worker. However, a positive HRSDC
AEO does not result in CIC issuing a work permit and does not
authorize the foreign national to work in Canada before becoming a
permanent resident.
Section 203 (1) to (3) of the Regulations sets out
the CIC conditions that must be met in order to apply for an LMO:
"on an application for a work permit, an officer (of CIC) shall
determine, on the basis of an opinion provided by the Department of
HRSDC, if the job offer is genuine and if the employment of the
foreign national is likely to have a neutral or positive economic
effect on the labour market in Canada." HRSDC provides the LMO based
on the request of an officer or an employer or group of employers. A
request may be made in respect of (a) an offer of employment to a
foreign national, and (b) offers of employment made, or anticipated
to be made, by an employer or group of employers. The LMO provided
by HRSDC shall be based on the following factors: (a) whether the
work is likely to result in direct job creation or job retention for
Canadian citizens or permanent residents; (b) whether the work is
likely to result in the creation or transfer of skills and knowledge
for the benefit of Canadian citizens or permanent residents; (c)
whether the work is likely to fill a labour shortage; (d) whether
the wages and working conditions offered are sufficient to attract
Canadian citizens or permanent residents to, and retain them in,
that work; (e) whether the employer has made, or has agreed to make,
reasonable efforts to hire or train Canadian citizens or permanent
residents; and (f) whether the employment of the foreign national is
likely to adversely affect the settlement of any labour dispute in
progress or the employment of any person involved in the
dispute."
A positive HRSDC LMO is a factor that CIC considers
when deciding whether to issue a work permit to the foreign
national. A positive HRSDC LMO and a work permit may also be used to
support the permanent immigration of a Skilled Worker. In this
situation, the employer is required to hire the worker before the
foreign national becomes a permanent resident of Canada.
In the special cases of LMOs and AEOs, employers
must be aware that HRSDC and CIC both utilize the National
Occupational Classification ("NOC") system to categorize jobs or
occupations. HRSDC reviews the wages and employment conditions that
the employer is offering the foreign national and compares them to
wages paid and employment conditions for Canadians in the same
occupation. If the employer is offering wages below rates paid to
Canadians in the occupation or fails to meet employment conditions
that are consistent with federal and/or provincial standards for the
occupation and workplace, HRSDC will not provide a positive LMO or
AEO.
From a practical standpoint, HRSDC has set forth
the following fundamental differences between LMOs and AEOs:
When applying for an LMO: advertising for the
position is needed; there is the need to prove there is a shortage
of skilled Canadians or permanent residents; the employer needs to
recruit Canadians or permanent residents; the foreign national is
able to start work as a temporary foreign worker only after CIC has
issued a work permit; the employer does not need to provide the
copies of remittance forms (Form PD7A) issued by the Canada Customs
and Revenue Agency ("CCRA"), itemizing source deductions for the
previous 12 months; the employer does not need to prove they have
employed anyone in the past; the employer does not need to prove
length of time in business; the labour market impact is a major
consideration; the employer does not need to have a presence in
Canada; the job can be seasonal; the occupation can be in any NOC
Skill Level; and, generally, HRSDC does not consider work that may
be facilitated pursuant to a CIC exemption.
When applying for an AEO: no advertising for
the position is needed; there is no need to prove there is a
shortage of skilled Canadians or permanent residents; there is no
need to recruit Canadians or permanent residents; the foreign
national must secure permanent resident status from CIC before
starting the job; the employer needs to provide the copies of
remittance forms (Form PD7A) issued by the CCRA, itemizing source
deductions for the previous 12 months; the employer needs to have
employed at least one person over the course of the past year; the
employer needs to provide evidence that the business has been in
operation for more than one year (by providing any one of the
following documents: business licenses spanning more than 12 months,
CCRA T4 [Summary of Deductions] for the previous year, commercial
lease agreement for the business location); the labour market impact
is not a consideration; the employer must have a presence in Canada;
the employment is full-time and not seasonal; the occupation must be
in NOC Skill Level 0, A or B; and CIC exemptions from the LMO
requirement do not apply. HRSDC can consider work that could be
exempt from needing an LMO. However, the foreign national should not
work in Canada for the employer before receiving a permanent
resident visa.
In September 2003, CIC did propose regulatory
amendments to amend certain provisions regarding LMOs and AEOs.
However, the proposed regulatory amendments have not as yet come
into effect.
USCIS ANNOUNCES EXTENSION OF STAY FOR SOME FOREIGN STUDENTS
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (the
"USCIS") announced on July 23, 2004 that certain academic and
exchange foreign students ("F" and "J" visa holders) seeking to
adjust to H-1B status may remain in the United States legally until
their H-1B petitions are decided.
Typically, these foreign students receive either a
60-day or 30-day grace period to close out affairs and return home
at the end of their educational programs. The transition period
usually allows enough time for qualified students to receive H-1B
status. Because the congressionally mandated H-1B cap for fiscal
year 2004 was reached in February, no new H-1B visas are available
until October, 2004. Thus, the grace period will not allow enough
time for a qualified foreign student to receive H-1B status. Without
an extension of the applicable grace period, the student would have
to leave the U.S. and return when an H-1B visa became available.
The extension of the grace period announced by the
USCIS on July 23, 2004 will allow affected foreign students to
remain in the U.S. and avoid the inconvenience of returning home
only to travel back to the U.S. in the near future.
Foreign students will only qualify for the extended
grace period if their prospective employer has filed an H-1B
petition on the student’s behalf before July 30, 2004. The petition
must include a requested employment start date of October 1, 2004.
Also, a student awaiting approval of an H-1B petition may not work
during the extended grace period or engage in any activities not
normally allowed during the grace period. This extended grace period
also applies to the foreign student’s dependents.
During the extended grace period, the Student and
Exchange Visitor Information System (also known as the SEVIS System)
will continue to maintain information about the student, but there
will be no new requirements on schools or student sponsors during
this timeframe. Foreign students are reminded that they have an
obligation under U.S. Immigration regulations to report each change
of address and new address to the Department of Homeland Security
during their stay in the U.S.
OLYMPIC UPDATE (NO. 3)

Here’s a summary of what has happened since
Vancouver won the 2010 Olympic race:
Vancouver 2010 was incorporated as the Vancouver organizing
committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games on
September 30, 2003.
A board of directors was appointed in October 2003. All Games
partners are represented on the 20-member board.
Work started on the $600 million Sea-to-Sky Highway upgrade in
November.
John Furlong was named as Chief Executive Officer of the Games
on February 20, 2004.
The first full visit of the IOC Co-ordination Commission was
completed on April 1, 2004.
VANOC (COVAN in French) was approved as the Games acronym on
April 1, 2004. It stands for Vancouver Organizing Committee for
the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
A national design competition for the Olympic logo was
launched last month.
The IOC appointed an 11-person co-ordination commission for
the Games, chaired by Rene Fasel.
CLARK WILSON LLP WEBSITES WIN TOP HONOURS

Clark Wilson was recently honored with two
significant website awards, following an independent survey
conducted by marketing attorney Micah Buchdahl of
InternetMarketingAttorney.Com. Clark Wilson’s website
(www.cwilson.com)
received top honors in the International Law Firm
category, which included hundreds of prominent firms from around the
world. Says Buchdahl, "It is rare that a site can still blow me
away, but this one was one of the most enjoyable surfing experiences
of the year. This 65-attorney Vancouver firm has taken the Internet
to all new levels."
The firm’s commercial real estate resource page,
BCRELinks.com,
was also recognized in a separate listing of ‘Nifty
Fifty’ sites. Buchdahl comments, "Developed by the firm’s commercial
real estate group, the ‘deal maker’s toolbox’ is one of the most
clever and creative ‘links’ sites you’ll find."
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS

For more information on any article contained in
this issue of Clark Wilson’s Immigration Lines or on any
immigration matter, please contact any member of our
Immigration
Group.
IMMIGRATION LINES VIA EMAIL

If you would prefer to receive Immigration
Lines via email, please send your name and email address to webmaster@cwilson.com.
You may access back issues of this and other Clark Wilson newsletters
on our website at www.cwilson.com.
|
|