In Canada, and,
generally around the world, patents protect new, non-obvious and
useful inventions.
However,
jurisdictions differ in the way that they define what an invention
is. For example, the United States famously defines
inventions as being, "anything under the sun created by man." In contrast, Canadian
patent law is more restrictive, requiring that any invention be
classifiable as:
·
an art (a mode,
method or manner of accomplishing a certain result as distinct from
the result itself, the art having to accomplish some change in the
character or condition of material objects);
·
a machine (an
embodiment in mechanism of any function or mode of operation
designed to accomplish a particular effect);
·
a process (a
mode or method of operation by which a result or effect is produced
by chemical action, by the operation or application of some element
or power of nature or of one substance on or to
another);
·
a manufacture
(anything made by the art or industry of man and connoting the
making of something which must be a vendible product of a process);
or
·
a composition of
matter (a chemical compound, composition or substance).
Furthermore,
for policy or moral reasons,
many jurisdictions also exclude specific types of invention from
patentability, for example:
·
living
organisms;
·
surgical,
therapeutic, or diagnostic methods of treatment for humans or
animals;
·
food;
·
games;
or
·
methods of
conducting business.
Through
this lens, it can be seen that the United States is exploring the
frontiers of patentable subject matter, while the rest of the world
looks on and considers.
Pundits, politicians, and patent office officials in other
jurisdictions have tended to scoff at the American adventurousness
at the patent frontier; however, they have also occasionally quietly
adopted similar positions, either tacitly or explicitly, usually on
a case-by-case basis.
Despite the noisy disdain, the frontier is being hotly
debated and businesses cannot afford to be timid and avoid
considering where the frontier may lie in two to seven years -- the
typical pendancy of a patent application; a wrong bet could
surrender tremendous advantage to a more aggressive competitor who
has more thoroughly assessed its environment.
One
part of the frontier that is being particularly hotly contested
relates to patents for seemingly non-technical inventions -- the
so-called “business method inventions”. The phrase “business method”
is deceivingly narrow when one studies the kinds of inventions that
are actually being patented in this field, which include games,
sports, entertainment, education, gambling, legal instruments and
business structures.
Australia, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Korea, Russia, and
Taiwan, among other jurisdictions, have been entertaining patents
for such inventions, even while remaining skeptical. To get a flavour for the
breadth of these inventions -- often absolutely non-technical
inventions -- one should keep abreast of the patents being granted
in this field by the United States Patent Office. Patents have been granted
for:
·
game and sport
inventions, for example a rhyming word game (US6019372);
a super baccarat card game (US673301);
a virtual tug of war (US6620043)
and soccer-golf (US6190272);
·
entertainment
inventions, for example broadcast/Internet game shows (US5518253,
US5545088,
US6340159,
US6439997,
US6616143,
US6800031);
a method for combining interactive content from a computer game with
a television broadcast (US6193610,
US6447396);
combining advertising and games so that viewers pay more attention
to the advertising (US6267675);
a method of inserting personalized advertising between television
shows (US6698020);
a cartoon graphical user interface for operating a television (US5524195);
push-wagering, in which bets are offered to a television viewer
based upon what he is watching (US6735487)
and a method of arranging competitions between fans of opposing
sports teams (US6758754);
·
marketing
inventions, including customer loyalty programs (US6345261);
methods of identifying and targeting influential rumormongers in
online communities (US6151585);
and methods of ordering store inventory based upon a weather
forecast (US6584447)
-- Wal-Mart has discovered a huge sales spike for Pop Tarts™,
particularly strawberry Pop Tarts™ in the Southern States when a
hurricane is forecast;
·
educational
inventions, for example methods of implementing home-schooling (US6464505)
and enriched education (US6347942);
·
inventions
related to legal instruments and business structures, for example
trusts (US4969094,
US5136502,
US5809484,
US5946668,
US6567790,
US6571219,
US6592030);
insurance products (US6272471,
US6473737,
US6725201,
US6745938,
US6772128,
US6840857);
tax structures (US6292788,
US6578016,
US6687681);
investment structures (US6070151,
US6253191,
US6321212)
and financing structures (US6460021,
US6671677,
US6792411);
and
·
litigation
modeling inventions, namely a method for making jury selection
determinations (US6607389).
Those
wanting to do business in the United States and those hoping to
predict trends at home should study these patent frontiers. Aggressive businesses have
sometimes succeeded in winning similar protection outside of the
United States, often with the assistance of clever patent lawyers
who have been able to make an invention look more conventionally
technical than it actually is.
If
you have developed an invention at the patent frontier, you
shouldn't assume that you cannot patent it. Consult your patent counsel
before relinquishing your competitive patent advantage.