MAY
2005

 

THE FRONTIERS OF PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER

In Canada, and, generally around the world, patents protect new, non-obvious and useful inventions. 

However, jurisdictions differ in the way that they define what an invention is.  For example, the United States famously defines inventions as being, "anything under the sun created by man."  In contrast, Canadian patent law is more restrictive, requiring that any invention be classifiable as:

·         an art (a mode, method or manner of accomplishing a certain result as distinct from the result itself, the art having to accomplish some change in the character or condition of material objects);

·         a machine (an embodiment in mechanism of any function or mode of operation designed to accomplish a particular effect);

·         a process (a mode or method of operation by which a result or effect is produced by chemical action, by the operation or application of some element or power of nature or of one substance on or to another);

·         a manufacture (anything made by the art or industry of man and connoting the making of something which must be a vendible product of a process); or

·         a composition of matter (a chemical compound, composition or substance).

Furthermore, for policy or moral reasons, many jurisdictions also exclude specific types of invention from patentability, for example:

·         living organisms;

·         surgical, therapeutic, or diagnostic methods of treatment for humans or animals;

·         food;

·         games; or

·         methods of conducting business.

Through this lens, it can be seen that the United States is exploring the frontiers of patentable subject matter, while the rest of the world looks on and considers.  Pundits, politicians, and patent office officials in other jurisdictions have tended to scoff at the American adventurousness at the patent frontier; however, they have also occasionally quietly adopted similar positions, either tacitly or explicitly, usually on a case-by-case basis.  Despite the noisy disdain, the frontier is being hotly debated and businesses cannot afford to be timid and avoid considering where the frontier may lie in two to seven years -- the typical pendancy of a patent application; a wrong bet could surrender tremendous advantage to a more aggressive competitor who has more thoroughly assessed its environment.

One part of the frontier that is being particularly hotly contested relates to patents for seemingly non-technical inventions -- the so-called “business method inventions”.  The phrase “business method” is deceivingly narrow when one studies the kinds of inventions that are actually being patented in this field, which include games, sports, entertainment, education, gambling, legal instruments and business structures.  Australia, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Korea, Russia, and Taiwan, among other jurisdictions, have been entertaining patents for such inventions, even while remaining skeptical.  To get a flavour for the breadth of these inventions -- often absolutely non-technical inventions -- one should keep abreast of the patents being granted in this field by the United States Patent Office.  Patents have been granted for:

·         game and sport inventions, for example a rhyming word game (US6019372); a super baccarat card game (US673301); a virtual tug of war (US6620043) and soccer-golf (US6190272);

·         entertainment inventions, for example broadcast/Internet game shows (US5518253, US5545088, US6340159, US6439997, US6616143, US6800031); a method for combining interactive content from a computer game with a television broadcast (US6193610, US6447396); combining advertising and games so that viewers pay more attention to the advertising (US6267675); a method of inserting personalized advertising between television shows (US6698020); a cartoon graphical user interface for operating a television (US5524195); push-wagering, in which bets are offered to a television viewer based upon what he is watching (US6735487) and a method of arranging competitions between fans of opposing sports teams (US6758754);

·         marketing inventions, including customer loyalty programs (US6345261); methods of identifying and targeting influential rumormongers in online communities (US6151585); and methods of ordering store inventory based upon a weather forecast (US6584447) -- Wal-Mart has discovered a huge sales spike for Pop Tarts™, particularly strawberry Pop Tarts™ in the Southern States when a hurricane is forecast;

·         educational inventions, for example methods of implementing home-schooling (US6464505) and enriched education (US6347942);

·         inventions related to legal instruments and business structures, for example trusts (US4969094, US5136502, US5809484, US5946668, US6567790, US6571219, US6592030); insurance products (US6272471, US6473737, US6725201, US6745938, US6772128, US6840857); tax structures (US6292788, US6578016, US6687681); investment structures (US6070151, US6253191, US6321212) and financing structures (US6460021, US6671677, US6792411); and

·         litigation modeling inventions, namely a method for making jury selection determinations (US6607389).

Those wanting to do business in the United States and those hoping to predict trends at home should study these patent frontiers.  Aggressive businesses have sometimes succeeded in winning similar protection outside of the United States, often with the assistance of clever patent lawyers who have been able to make an invention look more conventionally technical than it actually is.

If you have developed an invention at the patent frontier, you shouldn't assume that you cannot patent it.  Consult your patent counsel before relinquishing your competitive patent advantage.

 

 

.EU DOMAIN NAMES

The new top level domain name for Europe, .eu, is anticipated to be launched in late 2005. The central registry for .eu is EURid. Once EURid has finalized negotiations with ICANN to put .eu in the root server, accredited .eu registrars can be appointed and only accredited registrars will be allowed to accept pre-registrations for .eu domain names. Please note that at this time it is not possible to register or pre-register an .eu domain name and there are currently no accredited .eu registrars. Accreditation of registrars is scheduled to commence May 2005.

Eligibility for .eu Domain Name Registration

Regulations EC 733/2002 and EC 874/2004, of the European Commission, establish the basis and procedure for registration. Only businesses having a registered office or principal place of business in the European Union (“EU”), organizations established in the EU, regardless of governing law, and citizens who are residents in EU member states will be permitted to register .eu domain names.

If an entity is the holder of a Community Trademark but is based outside the EU, it will not be entitled to register an .eu domain name. However, it will be able to do so through a licensee based in Europe, as a licensee can be considered a rights holder in phase one of the sunrise period discussed below. If an entity does not currently meet the residence requirements outlined above, there may still be time to become eligible if the entity acts now, for example by establishing a local presence through a subsidiary with a license agreement and an application for a national European trademark. In some European trademark registries, such as Benelux, Ireland, Germany and the UK, it may be possible to obtain trademark registration approval within a year. In other registries, such as Italy, Portugal and Spain, delays longer than a year are likely.

Sunrise Period

There is a two-phased sunrise period during which only public bodies and those with recognized prior rights to a name (for example, trademark holders) may register. Each phase will be two months long.

During phase one of the sunrise period, only holders of registered trademarks, holders of geographic indications and public bodies (including international organizations), will be permitted to register.

During phase two, those listed in phase one and all other rights holders protected under national law of member states (i.e. company names, business identifiers, unregistered trademarks) will be permitted to register.

During the sunrise period, an applicant will have to provide documentary evidence of its prior right to a domain name within 40 days of submitting an application. The documentary evidence will be authenticated by validation agents appointed by EURid. EURid has appointed PriceWaterhouseCoopers as validation agents for the sunrise period. If there is more than one application for the same domain name, the first application to be received and validated will be successful. Therefore, it will be very important for an applicant to have its proof of rights available when applying to register, as time will be of the essence.

After the sunrise period expires, registration will be on a first-come, first-served basis.

Domain Technical Requirements

An .eu domain name must be a minimum of two characters among the letters a to z, numbers 0-9 and the hyphen. The domain name can only be a maximum of 63 characters and must not end or begin with a hyphen and the hyphen can not be in the third or fourth position.

Under Regulations EC 733/2002 and EC 874/2004 some names are blocked from being registered and some are reserved by institutions of the EU or governments of member states. A list of blocked names will be published once the European Community announces the list.

Registration Term and Costs

Registration will be for a term of one year, with automatic renewal on the anniversary date and deduction of renewal fees from a registrant’s account unless the registrant notifies EURid otherwise.

The fees are yet to be determined but will be based on the costs of validating the various types of rights. The proposed registration fee is EUR 10 (excluding VAT), which does not include fees charged by accredited registrars. Validation fees will be non-refundable.

Recommendations

Entities considering registration of an .eu domain name should perform an audit of existing trademarks to note which should be registered in the EU. An entity may wish to register an .eu domain name as a defensive strategy to stop a cybersquatter from registering that .eu domain name. Consideration should also be given to registering trade-marks, slogans, “sucks sites”, common misspellings and brand and product types with the .eu domain. If an entity is interested in registering an .eu domain name, it should compile its evidence of proof of rights in the EU as soon as possible. As noted above, time is of the essence and registrars will place applicants in a queue in the same order in which applications are received.

Please contact any member of our Technology and Intellectual Property Group to discuss registration of an .eu domain name.

   
CLARK WILSON LLP

Effective February 1, 2005, Clark, Wilson has become a limited liability partnership (LLP), as permitted by amendments to the Partnership Act. The firm is now known as Clark Wilson LLP, and you may notice that our logo has been updated to reflect the change.

As our new name suggests, the partnership now carries on the practice of law with a degree of limited liability. Each partner remains personally liable for his or her own actions, and the partnership continues to be liable for the negligence of its personnel. Accordingly, there is no reduction or limitation on partnership’s liability. However, an individual partner in a LLP is not personally liable for the negligence of another partner or an employee, unless he or she knew of the negligent act or omission and did not take reasonable steps to prevent it. The amendments to the Partnership Act bring BC more in line with other jurisdictions and our transition to a LLP will be an asset to us in continuing to recruit and retain strong legal talent.

This change will not affect our business practices or have any impact on our relationships with our clients. Our Managing Partner, Bill Helgason, or any of our lawyers would be pleased to answer any questions you have about this transition, or about LLP opportunities for your business.

CONGRATULATIONS TO KAREN MONTEITH!

We are pleased to announce that Karen Monteith recently became a Registered Canadian Trade-mark Agent, having passed the rigorous Trade-mark Agent’s exam. Karen has worked with our Practice Group for a number of years, primarily in the filing and prosecution of trade-mark applications. As a Trade-mark Agent she will continue in this role, with increased responsibilities communicating with clients and the Canadian Intellectual Property office. Congratulations Karen!

 

ADD/REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST

If you would like to be added or removed from this mailing service, please send requests to webmaster@cwilson.com.

 

KNOWLEDGE BYTES VIA EMAIL

If you would prefer to receive Knowledge Bytes via email, please send your name and e-mail address to webmaster@cwilson.com.  You may access back issues of this and other Clark Wilson newsletters on our website at www.cwilson.com.





William Helgason
Tel. 604.643.3103
E. wch@cwilson.com



Neil Melliship
Tel. 604.643.3154
E. npm@cwilson.com



Larry Munn
Tel. 604.643.3160
E. lm@cwilson.com



Michael Roman
Tel. 604.643.3132
E. mjr@cwilson.com



Brock Smith
Tel. 604.643.3186
E. bhs@cwilson.com



Karen Monteith
Tel. 604.643.3104
E. kar@cwilson.com


 

 

 


800.885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC  Canada  V6C 3H1
Tel. 604.687.5700
Fax. 604.687.6314

Questions or Comments?

For more information on any article contained in this issue of Clark Wilson LLP’s Knowledge Bytes or on any Technology and Intellectual Property matter, please contact any member of our Technology & Intellectual Property Group

Technology & Intellectual
Property Group Members
Lawyer Direct Telephone
& Email Info
William Helgason T. 604.643.3103
wch@cwilson.com
Neil Melliship T. 604.643.3154
npm@cwilson.com
Larry Munn T. 604.643.3160
lm@cwilson.com
Michael Roman T. 604.643.3132
mjr@cwilson.com
Brock Smith T. 604.643.3186
bhs@cwilson.com
Trade-Mark Agent
Karen Monteith T. 604.643.3104
kar@cwilson.com

   
Clark Wilson LLP's Knowledge Bytes is published periodically by the Technology & Intellectual Property Group at
Clark Wilson LLP. The information contained in this newsletter should not be treated by readers as legal advice and ought not to be
relied on without detailded legal counsel being sought. Editor: Karen Monteith © 2005, Clark Wilson LLP. All Rights Reserved.