FEBRUARY
2003
 


CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE NEWS
 

Construction Claims

This issue of Legal Framework includes the first of a series of articles that will focus on the topic of construction claims. The goal of the articles is to provide the reader with an overview of construction-related claims, along with helpful and practical advice on how to avoid these claims.

In this issue, Samantha Ip discusses how construction claims generally arise in the context of a construction project and provides some general advice on avoiding construction claims.

In our next issue, Samantha will discuss the issue of delay claims, a topic of interest to anyone who has been involved in a construction project.

Construction Collections Team

We are pleased to introduce our newly formed Construction Collections Team as part of the Construction Law Practice Group. The Construction Collections Team provides specialized collections services to contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers of construction materials, developers, and owners. Our approach to collections is practical and economical. A few of the more common services offered by the Construction Collections Group include:

  • Actions for debt

  • Claims of builders lien

  • Claims under bonds

  • Claims for breach of trust

  • Pre-judgment remedies

  • Post-judgment collection

Our Construction Collections Team acts for both those claiming for construction related debts and those against whom debts are claimed. To discuss any construction related collections issues that you or your business or organization may have, please contact either Adam Zasada or Bruce Gleig.

Hannelie Stockenstrom
 
 
  
AN OVERVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS: HOW THEY ARISE AND HOW TO AVOID THEM

How do Construction Claims Arise?

Construction claims can be caused by a number of factors. Understanding what causes construction claims is the first step in avoiding them. In general, construction claims occur because of the following:

  • Delays in construction and completion of the contract;

  • Delays in the delivery and supply of materials;

  • Weather which slows down or prevents construction from proceeding;

  • Owner requested changes;

  • Changes which occur not at the request of the owner;

  • Poor management and administration of the construction site;

  • Site conditions which differ from those expected;

  • The work becomes impossible to perform;

  • Insufficient plans and specifications;

  • Failure of any one party to disclose information which is material to the construction;

  • Conflicts between those involved in the construction of a project;

  • Termination of the contract by the owner or the contractor;

  • Acceleration of the work;

  • Failure to adequately schedule and coordinate the work; and

  • Failure of parties to cooperate with each other in the performance of the work.

General Recommendations for Avoiding Construction Claims

Those readers who have been involved in construction claims, and especially those which have resulted in arbitration or litigation, are aware that they are often a costly process. I encourage my clients to avoid such expenditures by performing effective risk management at the outset by trying to avoid construction claims in the first place.

Effective risk management for avoidance of claims involves a cost/benefits analysis at each stage of the construction. The realities of the construction industry and the profit driven bottom line often make it unrealistic and not cost effective to take all or even most of the recommended steps for avoiding construction claims. However, employing some of the following steps may save you more money in the long term by allowing you to avoid claims.

12 Steps to Avoiding Construction Claims

  1. The best way to ensure that something occurs or does not occur is to put it in the contract. Obtain good legal advice before entering into the contract in order to ensure that your interests are properly and adequately reflected in the contract. The standard general conditions may not be adequate for your needs. This is particularly true of public entities which have special and diverse needs and interests.

  2. Owners should try to hire contractors and consultants with whom they have a good relationship and who have a good reputation in the industry. You may have to do some research in order to determine a party's reputation in the industry.

  3. Owners should realize that the lowest bid is not always the best bid.

  4. Owners should ensure that the contract allows them to have some say in the general contractor's selection of its subtrades.

  5. Each party to a contract should ensure that they understand their duties and obligations under the contract and that they have the ability to perform these duties and obligations as required by the contract.

  6. Owners should ensure that a project is well planned from the outset to minimize the need for change orders or change directives. At least one study has shown that changes to the contract work increase the risk of construction claims and decrease productivity.

  7. Both owners and contractors should do what they can to ensure proper management and administration of the project, including proper and adequate staffing and co-ordination of the project and trades.

  8. All parties benefit from an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect and each party should do what they can to engender such an atmosphere.

  9. While it may be initially attractive to a party to shift all of the risk in the contract to the other party for matters such as insufficient plans and specifications and unexpected site conditions, a contract overly skewed in favour of one party over the other results in a higher chance of there being a dispute and hence, a construction claim. In my opinion, a contract that protects the interests of all parties and that does not include an overly unfair allocation of risk will result in a decreased likelihood of construction claims.

  10. Ensure proper and adequate documentation for the project.

  11. Acknowledge and settle claims which have merit at an early stage.

  12. Ensure that the contract has an adequate ADR process for dispute resolution.

Samantha Ip
 
 


LEGAL FRAMEWORK VIA EMAIL

 

If you would prefer to receive Legal Framework via email, please send your name and e-mail address to webmaster@cwilson.com.  You may access back issues of this and other Clark Wilson LLP newsletters on our website at www.cwilson.com.





Glen Boswall
Tel. 604.643.3125
E. rgb@cwilson.com



Bruce Gleig
Tel. 604.643.3178
E. dbg@cwilson.com



Keri Grenier
Tel. 604.643.3166
E. ktg@cwilson.com



Jonathan Hodes
Tel. 604.643.3168
E. jlh@cwilson.com



Samantha Ip
Tel. 604.643.3172
E. ssi@cwilson.com



Gilbert Larocque
Tel. 604.643.3144
E. gjl@cwilson.com



Amy Mortimore
Tel. 604.643.3177
E. aam@cwilson.com



Derek Mullan, Q.C.
Tel. 604.643.3162
E. djm@cwilson.com



Roy Nieuwenburg
Tel. 604.643.3112
E. ran@cwilson.com



Hannelie Stockenstrom
Tel. 604.643.3145
E. hgs@cwilson.com



Adam Zasada
Tel. 604.891.7742
E. aiz@cwilson.com

 


800.885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC  Canada  V6C 3H1
Tel. 604.687.5700
Fax. 604.687.6314

Barristers & Solicitors
Patent & Trade-Mark Agents


Questions or Comments?

For more information on any article contained in this issue of Clark Wilson LLP’s Legal Framework or on any Construction Group matter, please contact any member of our Construction Group.

Construction Group Members
Lawyer Direct Telephone
& Email Info
Glen Boswall T. 604.643.3125
rgb@cwilson.com
Bruce Gleig T. 604.643.3147
dbg@cwilson.com
Keri Grenier T. 604.643.3166
ktg@cwilson.com
Jonathan Hodes T. 604.643.3168
jlh@cwilson.com
Samantha Ip T. 604.643.3172
ssi@cwilson.com
Gilbert Larocque T. 604.643.3114
gjl@cwilson.com
Amy Mortimore T. 604.643.3177
aam@cwilson.com
Derek Mullan, Q.C. T. 604.643.3162
djm@cwilson.com
Roy Nieuwenburg T. 604.643.3112
ran@cwilson.com
Hannelie Stockenstrom T. 604.643.3145
hgs@cwilson.com
Adam Zasada T. 604.891.7742
aiz@cwilson.com
   
Clark Wilson LLP’s Legal Framework is published periodically by the Construction Group at Clark Wilson LLP. The information contained in
this newsletter should not be treated by readers as legal advice and ought not to be relied on without detailed legal counsel being sought.
Editor: Hannelie Stockenstrom © 2003, Clark Wilson LLP. All Rights Reserved.