|
BCSC REVIEWS TECHNICAL MINING DISCLOSURE IN PROSPECTUS FILINGS
In early 2008, the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) completed a study of recent mining prospectus filings to determine to what extent the filings complied with mining disclosure as required by National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101).
In conducting the review, the BCSC:
- Assessed compliance and quality of the filings;
- Focused on obvious deficiencies not requiring technical expertise;
- Looked specifically at the technical report prepared to ensure that it supported the technical disclosure.
Technical Report Assessment
The BCSC reviewed the following, which they consider do not need technical expertise to review:
- That report authors
- Are qualified persons
- Are responsible for all sections of the report
- Have conducted a current site visit
- Are independent (if required).
- That the basic format of the report complies with NI 43-101
- Is it signed, dated, addressed to issuer?
- Does it have the proper headings and basic information?
- Is there information on all areas of property?
- That there is compliance with Form 43-101
- Is the report current?
- Are maps and figures legible?
- Is there data verification?
- Is there a work recommendation and breakdown of costs?
- Are the economics and engineering for reserves set out?
- Is item 25 for development/production projects discussed? (for example: mining method, metallurgical processes, production forecasts, environmental considerations)
- Compliance with NI 43-101 Disclosure
- Required cautionary language
- Required details for mineral resources and mineral reserves
- No inappropriate disclaimers of responsibility or reliance
- Certificate of Qualified Person
- Signed, dated, and filed for each Qualified Person
- All statements required by s.8.1(2)
- Consents of Qualified Person
- Signed, dated, and filed for each Qualified Person
- Qualified Person consents to filing and use of report
- Qualified Person certifies has read prospectus or AIF
- Use of proceeds disclosure
- Consistent with recommendations and costs
- Explains large amounts of unallocated working capital, if any
- Technical reports filed
- Current report for all material properties
- Prospectus/AIF refers to supporting report
- Consistency of disclosure document with technical report
- Cautionary language
- Property description
- Mineral resources and reserves
- Economic analysis and production forecasts
- Interpretation, conclusions, recommendations
- Other
- Relevant management mining expertise
The BCSC found the following problem areas:
- No recommendations or cost breakdown
- Non-compliant disclaimers
- Qualified Person not taking responsibility
- Deficient or missing certificates
- Deficient or missing consents
- Non-compliant disclaimers
- Figures missing or illegible
- Not in required form
- Non-compliant resources
- Report not current
- No data verification
- Deficient or missing certificates
- Use of proceeds disclosure
The BCSC has determined to improve compliance through the following methods:
- Focusing compliance work based on risk factors
- Rejecting significantly substandard filings
- Basic review when filed
- Industry education and consultation
- Refer problem Qualified Persons to APEGBC
If you have any questions about how to ensure that your mining disclosure documents are compliant with current rules, contact any member of Clark Wilson LLP’s Corporate Finance / Securities Group.
SEC PROPOSED NEW "NAKED SHORT SELLING" RULE
On March 7, 2008 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed to take additional steps to better safeguard investors and protect the integrity of the markets during short selling transactions by proposing a rule that would specify that abusive “naked” short selling is a fraud.
In a naked short sale, the seller does not borrow or arrange to borrow the securities in time to make delivery to the buyer within the standard three day settlement period for trades. As a result, the seller fails to deliver stock to the buyer when delivery is due. This is known as a “failure to deliver.” Sellers sometimes intentionally fail to deliver securities to the buyer as part of a scheme to manipulate the price of a security, or possibly to avoid borrowing costs associated with short sales.
Under Regulation SHO, the executing or order-entry broker-dealer is responsible for determining whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a security can be borrowed so that it can be delivered on the date delivery is due on a short sale, and whether a seller owns the security being sold and can reasonably expect that the security will be in the physical possession or control of the broker-dealer no later than settlement date for a long sale. However, a broker-dealer relying on a customer that makes misrepresentations about its locate source or ownership of shares may not receive shares when delivery is due. For example, sellers may be making misrepresentations to their broker-dealers about their locate sources or ownership of shares for securities that are very difficult or expensive to borrow. Such sellers may know that they cannot deliver securities by settlement date due to, for example, a limited number of shares being available to borrow or purchase, or they may not intend to obtain shares for timely delivery because the cost of borrowing or purchasing may be high. This result undermines the SEC’s goal of addressing concerns related to “naked” short selling and extended fails to deliver.
The SEC proposed a new rule, Rule 10b-21, that would highlight the specific liability of parties who deceive others, such as broker-dealers and purchasers, about their intention or ability to deliver securities in time for settlement and that fail to deliver securities by settlement date.
“This rule proposal will help protect and enhance the operation, integrity and stability of the markets in the clearance and settlement system, and also puts market participants on notice that the Commission will continue targeting abuses in this area,” said Erik Sirri, Director of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets.
The comment period for the proposal will end 60 days from the date of publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.
If you have any questions about short sales, contact any member of Clark Wilson LLP’s Corporate Finance / Securities Group.
STEWART MUGLICH JOINS CLARK WILSON LLP'S CORPORATE FINANCE / SECURITIES GROUP
We are pleased to welcome Stewart Muglich as a Partner in Clark Wilson’s Corporate Finance / Securities Group.
Stewart's practice will encompass most areas of corporate finance and securities law including corporate acquisitions, divestitures, reorganizations, private transactions, public and private offerings and other financings. He will also provide strategic advice on both proxy contests and hostile and negotiated takeover bids, cross-border offerings and acquisitions.
Stewart received a B.A. in 1986 from Simon Fraser University and an LL.B. in 1989 from the University of British Columbia. He also received an LL.M. in International Business and Trade Law and an M.B.A. in Corporate Finance from Fordham University in New York in 1991 and 1992, respectively. Stewart was called to the British Columbia Bar in 1990 and admitted to practice at the New York State Bar in 1991.
Stewart can be reached at 604.891.7701 or by email at slm@cwilson.com.
CLARK WILSON LLP'S CORPORATE FINANCE / SECURITIES LAW GROUP
Clark Wilson LLP’s Corporate Finance/ Securities Law Group
assists companies listed on Canadian and U.S. stock exchanges and
over-the-counter trading markets, including NASDAQ, Amex, TSX and
the OTC Bulletin Board. Our attorneys are qualified to practice in
various Canadian and United States jurisdictions. We are experienced
in Canadian, United States and cross-border transactions; U.S. and
Canadian regulatory filing and SEC registrations; reverse takeovers;
and mergers and acquisitions. For more information, contact Bernard
Pinsky or any member of our Corporate Finance/ Securities Law
Group.
ADD/REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST
If you would like to be added or removed from this mailing
service, please send requests to webmaster@cwilson.com,
including Securities Law Bulletin in your
subject line.
|