FEBRUARY

2004
 


MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW CANADIAN HOLD PERIODS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Until March 30, 2004, Multilateral Instrument No. 45-102 (the "Resale Rules") imposes resale restrictions that are either 4 months or 12 months on newly issued securities, depending on whether the issuer is a "qualifying issuer". A "qualifying issuer" is a reporting issuer which is an electronic filer under SEDAR, which has filed a current Annual Information Form ("AIF"), and which has a class of equity securities listed or quoted on certain specified stock exchanges or trading markets. A reporting issuer which is not a "qualifying issuer" must issue securities with a 12 month hold period.

On March 30, 2004, changes to the Resale Rules, to Multilateral Instrument No. 45-103, "Capital Raising Exemptions", (the "Capital Raising Rules") and to National Instrument No. 51-102, "Continuous Disclosure Obligations" (the "Disclosure Rules") combine to change the landscape dramatically for reporting issuers in Canada.

First, the Disclosure Rules, to be implemented in all jurisdictions in Canada, impose substantial new disclosure requirements on reporting issuers. The Disclosure Rules require continuous and prompt disclosure of all material changes, including press releases, acquisition reports, financial statements, and management discussion and analysis; and the filing of copies of Articles of Incorporation, material contracts, and most significantly, except for "venture issuers", the annual filing of an AIF. An AIF contains disclosure about the issuer and all its aspects as of a certain date. An AIF must include meaningful analysis of the issuer and its prospects, as well as factual information. All of the disclosure documents must be set out in plain language, including short sentences, everyday language, avoiding jargon and avoiding boilerplate wording.

As a result of the fact that all reporting issuers in Canada will have filed and made available to everyone through SEDAR the continuous disclosure information required by the Disclosure Rules, the Resale Rules have eliminated the definition of "qualifying issuer" and all reporting issuers may issue securities after March 30, 2004, with 4 month hold periods. No reporting issuer is required to restrict the resale of securities for more than 4 months. including "venture issuers".

Under the Disclosure Rules, an AIF filed by an issuer must meet the form requirements of the Disclosure Rules, or, alternatively, a US reporting issuer can file its Form 10-K, Form 10-KSB or Form 20-F as its AIF.

A "venture issuer" does not have to file an AIF annually, but does need to meet all the other disclosure requirements of the Disclosure Rules. A "venture issuer" means a reporting issuer that does not have its securities listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, a US marketplace or a marketplace outside of Canada and the US. This means, for example, that a company listed solely on the TSX-V is a "venture issuer", but a company inter-listed on the TSX-V and OTCBB is not a "venture issuer". However, the OTCBB listed issuer can file its Form 10-KSB as an AIF and meet the requirements of the Disclosure Rules.

Until March 30, 2004, the Capital Raising Rules refer to the definition of "qualifying issuer" in the Resale Rules. Since the Resale Rules have no need of the definition of "qualifying issuer" (because all reporting issuers will have the same 4 month hold period), the Capital Raising Rules have introduced the definition of "qualifying issuer" for certain purposes. The definition contains the same definition as the Resale Rules had previously. "Venture issuers", therefore, do not need to file an AIF to issue securities with 4 month holder periods, but may need to file an AIF in order to qualify for certain capital-raising exemptions. For example, in the amended Capital Raising Rules, a short form of Offering Memorandum, Form 45-103F2, is only available to "qualifying issuers" because the issuer’s AIF is incorporated by reference. A venture issuer that expects to raise financing by way of Offering Memorandum may therefore wish to voluntarily file an AIF to reduce cost and delay in its proposed financings.

MEANINGFUL MD&A: SEC GUIDANCE - PART I

CEO/ CFO CERTIFICATIONS: BREAKFAST SEMINAR,
MARCH 17/04

CEO/ CFO Certifications: Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls for Canadian and U.S. Public Companies.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Canadian Securities Administrators MI 52-109 (taking effect March 30/04) both have serious implications for how public companies, and their chief executive and financial officers, must now govern themselves, and create personal liability. The new rules require certifications of financial disclosure by CEOs and CFOs of public companies in Canada and the US.

On March 17, 2004, Clark Wilson LLP and Grant Thornton LLP are offering a breakfast seminar, CEO/ CFO CERTIFICATIONS: Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls for Canadian and U.S. Public Companies. This seminar will provide you with clear, concise and most importantly, practical information that will allow you to develop, evaluate and certify your company's internal and disclosure controls and procedures. The information you will receive in this seminar will be both useful and timely.

For the seminar agenda, speaker profiles, location and cost information, visit the Seminars section of Clark Wilson LLP’s website at www.cwilson.com. Or, contact Michelle Zizek at mmz@cwilson.com / tel. 604.891.7706.


CLARK WILSON LLP'S SECURITIES GROUP WELCOMES
GRANT WONG

Clark Wilson LLP is delighted to announce that effective February 1, 2004, Grant Wong has joined our Corporate Finance / Securities Law Department. Grant is a native of Vancouver and a graduate of the University of British Columbia. Grant received his Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) in 1993 and his Bachelor of Laws in 1996.

From 1996 to 1999, Grant practised as a corporate securities lawyer in the Vancouver office of a well-known national firm. In 1999, Grant was offered the opportunity to work with a premier global law firm in London England, as a corporate finance associate. In London, Grant worked on corporate finance transactions for some of the world’s largest companies. In 2002, Grant decided to return to British Columbia.

    
CLARK WILSON LLP'S CORPORATE FINANCE/
SECURITIES LAW GROUP

Clark Wilson LLP’s Corporate Finance/Securities Law Group assists companies listed on Canadian and U.S. stock exchanges and over-the-counter trading markets, including NASDAQ, Amex, TSX and the OTC Bulletin Board. Our attorneys are qualified to practice in various Canadian and United States jurisdictions. We are experienced in Canadian, United States and cross-border transactions; U.S. and Canadian regulatory filing and SEC registrations; reverse takeovers; and mergers and acquisitions.

    
ADD/ REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST

    
SECURITIES LAW BULLETIN VIA EMAIL

If you would prefer to receive Securities Law Bulletin via email, please send your name and email address to webmaster@cwilson.com.  You may access back issues of this and other Clark Wilson LLP newsletters on our website at www.cwilson.com.

If would like to be added to or removed from the mailing list for this publication, please contact Michelle Zizek by phone at 604.891.7706 or email mmz@cwilson.com.

In addition to being a British Columbia lawyer, Grant is admitted to practice law in England and Wales and in the State of New York. Grant will add breadth to our ability to deliver United States and international legal services to our clients in British Columbia and elsewhere. Grant’s direct line is 604.643.3178 and his email is gyw@cwilson.com.

On December 19, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") published interpretive guidance regarding management's discussion and analysis disclosure ("MD&A"), which is intended to elicit more meaningful disclosure in MD&A in a number of areas. The SEC stated that it expects that when companies follow the guidance in this release, the overall quality of their MD&A will improve. The interpretive guidance can be found at www.sec.gov/rules/interp/33-8350.htm

The SEC reiterated that MD&A should be a discussion and analysis of a company's business as seen through the eyes of those who manage that business. As such, MD&A should not be a recitation of financial statements in narrative form or an otherwise uninformative series of technical responses to MD&A requirements, neither of which provides this important management perspective.

With respect to presentation of the MD&A disclosure, the SEC emphasized that:

  • companies can improve the clarity and understandability of their MD&A by using language that is clearer and less convoluted;

  • companies should consider whether a tabular presentation of relevant financial or other information may help a reader's understanding of MD&A, which could include line items and percentage changes as well as other information determined by a company to be useful;

  • companies should consider whether the headings they use assist readers in understanding the MD&A, and whether additional headings would be helpful in this regard;

  • companies should present their disclosure so that the most important information is most prominent, which may include starting their MD&A with a section that provides an executive-level overview that highlights the most important information and provides context for the remainder of the MD&A discussion; and

  • companies should avoid unnecessary duplicative disclosure that can tend to overwhelm readers and act as an obstacle to identifying and understanding material matters.

With respect to focus and content of the MD&A disclosure, the SEC emphasized that:

  • in deciding on the content of MD&A, companies should focus on material information and eliminate immaterial information;

  • companies should identify and discuss key performance indicators, including non-financial performance indicators, that their management uses to manage the business and that would be material to investors;

  • companies must identify and disclose known trends, events, demands, commitments and uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the financial condition or the operating performance of their business;

  • to satisfy the objectives of MD&A, companies also should provide a balanced view of the underlying dynamics of the business, including not only a description of a company's successes, but also of instances when it failed to realize goals;

  • in preparing MD&A, companies should evaluate issues presented in previous periods and consider reducing or omitting discussion of those that may no longer be material or helpful, or revise discussions where a revision would make the continuing relevance of an issue more apparent;

  • MD&A should also, where material, analyze the reasons underlying the numbers in the financial statements, such as an inability to realize previously projected economies of scale, a failure to renew or secure key customer contracts, or a failure to keep downtime at acceptable levels due to aging equipment; and

  • companies also should consider whether the economic characteristics of any of their business arrangements, or the methods used to account for them, materially impact their results of operations or liquidity in a structured or unusual fashion, where disclosure would be necessary to understand the amounts depicted in their financial statements.

Part II of this article, which covers the SEC’s comments respecting the liquidity and capital resources section of the MD&A disclosure, will run in the March issue of Clark Wilson’s Securities Law Bulletin.


Changes to the Resale Rules, Capital Raising Rules and the Disclosure Rules are going to make substantial differences for reporting issuers in Canada. If you have questions about how the amended instruments will affect your company, contact any one of Clark Wilson LLP’s Corporate Finance/Securities Law Group.







Bernard Pinsky
Tel. 604.643.3153
E. bip@cwilson.com



Herb Ono
Tel. 604.643.3140
E. hio@cwilson.com



Virgil Hlus
Tel. 604.891.7707
E. vzh@cwilson.com



Bill Macdonald
Tel. 604.643.3118
E. wlm@cwilson.com



Ethan Minsky
Tel. 604.643.3151
E. epm@cwilson.com



Larry Yen
Tel. 604.891.7717
E. lky@cwilson.com

 

Barristers & Solicitors
Patent & Trade-Mark Agents

800 - 885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC  Canada  V6C 3H1
Tel. 604.687.5700
Fax. 604.687.6314

Questions or Comments?

For more information on any article contained in this issue of Clark Wilson LLP’s Securities Law Bulletin or on any Corporate Finance or Securities matter, please contact any member of our Corporate Finance / Securities Group.

Articles may be reproduced with a credit stating "Reproduced from Clark Wilson LLP's Securities Law Bulletin". Please forward a copy of any reproduced article to "Marketing" at Clark Wilson LLP.



Corporate Finance / Securities  Practice Group Members
Lawyer Direct Telephone
& Email Info
Bernard Pinsky T. 604.643.3153
bip@cwilson.com
Herb Ono T. 604.643.3140
hio@cwilson.com
Virgil Hlus T. 604.891.7707
vzh@cwilson.com
Bill Macdonald T. 604.643.3118
wlm@cwilson.com
Ethan Minsky T. 604.643.3151
epm@cwilson.com
Grant Wong T. 604.643.3178
gyw@cwilson.com
Larry Yen T. 604.891.7715
lky@cwilson.com
   
Clark Wilson LLP's Securities Law Bulletin is published periodically by the Corporate Finance / Securities Practice Group at
Clark Wilson LLP. The information contained in this newsletter should not be treated by readers as legal advice and ought not to be
relied on without detailded legal counsel being sought. Editor: Bernard Pinsky © 2004, Clark Wilson LLP. All Rights Reserved.