On January 3, 2005,
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted
Regulation SHO which regulates short selling. Regulation SHO was
enacted to deter abusive “naked” short selling, which occurs where a
person sells a security without owning or even having access to the
security necessary to make delivery. This is to be distinguished
from legal short selling, where the seller may not own the
securities sold but does have access to or ability to borrow the
securities and therefore make delivery. Although short selling can
provide market liquidity and pricing efficiency, naked short selling
may cause a number of negative market impacts, particularly when a
large unfulfilled delivery obligation exists at the clearing agency
where the trades are settled. In order to reduce the negative
consequences of naked short selling, Regulation SHO:
1. imposes new locate
requirements on broker-dealers before selling and imposes delivery
or close-out requirements on broker-dealers for securities in which
a substantial number of instances of failure-to-deliver have
occurred;
2. adopts new
order-marking requirements;
3. creates a pilot program
and temporarily suspends the operation of the “tick” test for
certain securities;
4. defers consideration of
the uniform bid test of proposed Rule 201;
5. defines ownership of
certain securities for the purposes of determining delivery and
close-our requirements; and
6. eliminates the shelf
offering exception to prohibit the use of offering shares to cover
short sales effected prior to the pricing of a shelf offering.
Locate and
Close-Out Requirement: Rule 203 of
Regulation SHO requires all broker-dealers to “locate” securities
available for borrowing before executing a short sale in any equity
security. The rule prohibits a broker-dealer from executing a short
sale for its own account or for the account of another person,
unless the broker-dealer or person, as applicable, borrowed the
security or entered into an arrangement to borrow the security or
has “reasonable grounds” to believe that it could borrow the
security so that it can be delivered on the date that delivery is
due. The locate requirement must be made and documented in writing
prior to making the trade, regardless of whether the short position
could be closed out by purchasing securities that same day.
The SEC has
provided three exceptions to the locate requirement. First, when a
broker-dealer exerts a short sale for another broker-dealer, only
the first broker-dealer must fulfill the locate requirement. Second,
the locate requirement is extended to 35 days in circumstances where
the broker-dealer effects the sale of a security that is not
expected to be available on the delivery date, such as a security
tendered for conversion or a resale of a restricted security
pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. Third, market
makers are exempt from the locate requirement where the short sale
is effected in connection with bona fide market making activities.
The SEC has commented that the following activities do not
constitute bona fide market making:
1. activity that is
related to speculative selling strategies of the broker-dealer and
is disproportionate to the broker-dealer’s usual market making
patterns or practices;
2. activity whereby the
market maker posts continually at or near the best offer but does
not also post at or near the best bid; or
3. transactions whereby
the market maker enters into an arrangement with another
broker-dealer or customer to use the market maker’s exception to
avoid compliance with the locate requirement.
Rule 203(a) sets
out the delivery requirements for “long” sales. If a broker-dealer
knows or ought reasonably to know that a sale of an equity security
is marked long, the broker-dealer must make delivery when due and
cannot use borrowed securities to do so. The SEC has noted, however,
that it may be unreasonable for a broker-dealer to treat the sale as
“long” where the customer has repeatedly failed to deliver the
security by the settlement date.
Rule 203 of
Regulation SHO imposes requirements aimed at “threshold securities”
where there is evidence of significant settlement failures. A
threshold security means an equity security for which there is an
aggregate fail-to-deliver position for five consecutive settlement
days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more per
security, where the level of fails is equal to at least one half of
one percent of the issuer’s total securities outstanding and the
security is included on a list published by a self-regulatory
organization (“SRO”) such as the NASD. For example, one-half of one
percent (0.005) of 1,000,000 shares outstanding is 5,000 shares. The
list of threshold securities will be published daily by the SRO on
which the security is listed or bears surveillance
responsibility.
Rule 203(b)(3)
requires a market maker or broker-dealer, to close out any
fail-to-deliver position in a threshold security that has remained
open for 10 consecutive days after the settlement date (13 days in
total) by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity. If the
participant does not close out the position, Rule 203(b)(3)(iii)
states that the market maker is prohibited from effecting further
short sales in the threshold security until it borrows, or arranges
to borrow, the security to close out the fail-to-deliver
position.
Order
Marking: Regulation SHO
adopts marking requirements for all sell orders, requiring all
equity securities to be marked as either “long”, “short” or “exempt
short”. Exempt short refers to short sales permitted under an
exemption.
Ownership: In order
to determine when a security is owned for the purposes of the
delivery and close-out rules of Regulation SHO, the SEC has defined
ownership of unconditional sales contracts, securities underlying
futures products and aggregation units.
Additionally, Rule
200 incorporates the short sale definition in Rule 3b-3 and includes
the standard for determining whether the seller has a “net long
position”, hence ownership, in a security. The seller of an equity
security must aggregate all of its positions in the security across
all accounts. The SEC, however, incorporated its no-action position
into Rule 200(f) which allows registered broker-dealers to calculate
their “net-long” or “net-short” positions within defined
“aggregation” units instead of on a firm-wide basis, subject to
certain requirements. The aggregation unit exception is not extended
to non-broker dealers as such entities are not subject to regulatory
oversight.
If you have any
questions about Regulation SHO, contact any member of Clark Wilson
LLP’s Corporate Finance/ Securities Law Group.