You may have seen my article in Your Estate Matters earlier this week on how a joint a tenancy can be severed by a “course of dealings”. In that same vein, the BC Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Houston v. Houston that the holder of a Power of Attorney can sever joint tenancy so long as the terms of the Power of Attorney don’t contain any restriction that would prevent that from being performed. The party attacking the acts of the holder of the Power of Attorney argued that severance of a joint tenancy was basically akin to making a new Will (or, as a lawyer would say, “tantamount to a testamentary act”) and therefore beyond the authority of the attorney. The Court rejected that argument, noting that severance of a joint tenancy, unlike some other acts (like designation of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy), can be done unilaterally and isn’t connected to or dependant on the donor’s death. So, in the case of Houston anyway, the POA didn’t do anything he wasn’t allowed to do.
Subscribe to our newsletters
Stay current on business and legal news, topics and trends
Related Content

8 Things You Should Know About TFSA and RRSP Designations
Beneficiary designations on your TFSA and RRSP have a few options that you may not be aware of.

Probate Fee Avoidance: The Potential Benefits and Challenges of Using Multiple Wills
By Tadhg Bradford and Zachary Murphy-Rogers You may be familiar with the term “probate”. Probate is the process through which the BC Supreme Court issues ... Continued

Which Jurisdiction’s laws will govern your estate?
Introduction In our globalized world, it is not uncommon for people to own property or have residences in multiple jurisdictions. The international aspect of a ... Continued