You may have seen my article in Your Estate Matters earlier this week on how a joint a tenancy can be severed by a “course of dealings”. In that same vein, the BC Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Houston v. Houston that the holder of a Power of Attorney can sever joint tenancy so long as the terms of the Power of Attorney don’t contain any restriction that would prevent that from being performed. The party attacking the acts of the holder of the Power of Attorney argued that severance of a joint tenancy was basically akin to making a new Will (or, as a lawyer would say, “tantamount to a testamentary act”) and therefore beyond the authority of the attorney. The Court rejected that argument, noting that severance of a joint tenancy, unlike some other acts (like designation of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy), can be done unilaterally and isn’t connected to or dependant on the donor’s death. So, in the case of Houston anyway, the POA didn’t do anything he wasn’t allowed to do.
Subscribe to our newsletters
Stay current on business and legal news, topics and trends
Related Content
Drafting a Will In Light of the Rule in Howe v. Earl of Dartmouth
When deciding how to distribute property under a will, a will-maker will sometimes wish to delay when those assets are transferred to a particular beneficiary, ... Continued
A Certain Uncertainty – Discretionary Trusts and the Division of Family Property
Many families choose a discretionary trust when planning their estates for the operative term: discretion. However, along with this discretion comes a high degree of ... Continued
The Cost(s) of Playing Favourites (and Being a Favourite)
Discussion on the financial and emotional costs of favouring one child in the will.