You may have seen my article in Your Estate Matters earlier this week on how a joint a tenancy can be severed by a “course of dealings”. In that same vein, the BC Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Houston v. Houston that the holder of a Power of Attorney can sever joint tenancy so long as the terms of the Power of Attorney don’t contain any restriction that would prevent that from being performed. The party attacking the acts of the holder of the Power of Attorney argued that severance of a joint tenancy was basically akin to making a new Will (or, as a lawyer would say, “tantamount to a testamentary act”) and therefore beyond the authority of the attorney. The Court rejected that argument, noting that severance of a joint tenancy, unlike some other acts (like designation of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy), can be done unilaterally and isn’t connected to or dependant on the donor’s death. So, in the case of Houston anyway, the POA didn’t do anything he wasn’t allowed to do.
Subscribe to our newsletters
Stay current on business and legal news, topics and trends
Related Content

West Vancouver (District) v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCSC 966
On June 29, 2020, the BC Supreme Court issued its decision in West Vancouver (District) v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCSC 966 (CanLII). This ... Continued

Legal Trend: evidence of testamentary intent can ‘save’ otherwise invalid wills or gifts
Background The recently reported case of Bach Estate (Re)[1] is the first decision to rule on section 43 of the Wills, Estate and Succession Act[2] ... Continued

Will a marriage agreement stop a court from varying a will?
For almost 100 years, we have had legislation in BC that allows a court to vary a will to cause a larger part of the ... Continued