You may have seen my article in Your Estate Matters earlier this week on how a joint a tenancy can be severed by a “course of dealings”. In that same vein, the BC Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Houston v. Houston that the holder of a Power of Attorney can sever joint tenancy so long as the terms of the Power of Attorney don’t contain any restriction that would prevent that from being performed. The party attacking the acts of the holder of the Power of Attorney argued that severance of a joint tenancy was basically akin to making a new Will (or, as a lawyer would say, “tantamount to a testamentary act”) and therefore beyond the authority of the attorney. The Court rejected that argument, noting that severance of a joint tenancy, unlike some other acts (like designation of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy), can be done unilaterally and isn’t connected to or dependant on the donor’s death. So, in the case of Houston anyway, the POA didn’t do anything he wasn’t allowed to do.
Subscribe to our newsletters
Stay current on business and legal news, topics and trends
Related Content

Robledano v Queano, 2019 BCCA 150 – Further Analysis of Spousal Status Issues
The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently released its judgment in Robledano v Queano, 2019 BCCA 150 (“Robledano”). The case involved an intestate estate, with ... Continued

Text Message Wills?
Although a recent Swedish case rejected a text message will, WESA could give courts the discretion to find them valid

Successful Appeal in Presumption of Resulting Trust Case
The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that, when assets are transferred from a parent to an adult child without anything given in return, the ... Continued