A commentary by Nigel Kent and articled student David Buxton-Forman was published in the May 2013 edition of Canadian Insurance Top Broker. The commentary discusses a recent decision that considered whether a breach of the duty of good faith could arise in the absence of damages flowing from a breach of an express term of the underlying insurance contract.
Related Content
Ontario Court Confirms Binding Nature of Bought Deal Engagement Letters
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) recently confirmed the binding nature of bought deal engagement letters when it awarded a judgment of $16,042,669 plus interest and costs in favour of Stetson Oil & Gas Ltd. (TSXV: SSN), a junior oil and gas exploration company, and against Thomas Weisel Partners Canada Inc. (now Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc.) (“Weisel”), an investment bank and a securities dealer, for Weisel’s failure to close a bought deal private placement pursuant to an engagement letter with Stetson.
2018 Annual Review of Law & Practice Published
The 27th edition of the CLE BC Annual Review of Law & Practice has just been released. The book highlights key developments of the past year ... Continued
David Austin interviewed on CKNW
On Wednesday, April 16, David Austin was interviewed on CKNW regarding the global demand for LNG and the prospects for supplying some of this demand ... Continued