Our recent Insurance Interest, “Duty to Defend: Who is ‘you’?” was republished in the June 2013 edition of the Canadian Insurance Law Reporter. In the article, Nigel Kent provides another reminder to the insurance industry that the “plain English” use of words like “you” and “your” can lead to ambiguity and a duty to defend.
Related Content
Case Analysis – Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) by unanimous decision on June 26, 2014 in the case of Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia declared for the ... Continued
BCSC Eases Rules for Securities Issued to Non-Residents
On October 31, 2017, the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) revoked and replaced BC Instrument 72-503 Distribution of Securities outside British Columbia (BCI 72-503). BCI ... Continued
Predatory marriage set aside for mental incapacity
Emily Clough, a partner in our Estates & Trusts group, was successful counsel for the plaintiff in a complex and precedent-setting case released yesterday by ... Continued