Jennifer Loeb and Nigel Kent recently received reasons for judgment in Corbould v. BCAA Insurance Corporation, 2010 BCSC 1536, a claim for insurance coverage related to a furnace fuel spill that damaged the plaintiff’s recreational home. In dismissing the lawsuit with costs, the Court adopted wholesale the defendant’s arguments concerning policy interpretation, the doctrine of reasonable expectations and the pollution exclusion. The link to the case is http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/10/15/2010BCSC1536.htm.
Related Content
The ‘Privilege Clause’ in construction tender documents – Supreme Court of Canada decision in M.J.B. Enterprises v. Defence Construction Ltd.
This much–awaited decision has come down. It always was a simple case. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed what we already knew, from Ron Engineering, ... Continued
Jeff Morton published in IPIC Bulletin
Jeff Morton, along with lawyers from Gowlings and Dorsey & Whitney (New York), recently published an article entitled “Key Differences Between Canada and the United ... Continued
Clark Wilson completes $61 million oil and gas assets sale for Bucking Horse Energy Inc.
Ethan Minsky, Bernard Pinsky and Amaan Gangji of Clark Wilson’s Corporate Finance & Securities Group assisted Bucking Horse Energy Inc., through its US subsidiary, in ... Continued