Jennifer Loeb and Nigel Kent recently received reasons for judgment in Corbould v. BCAA Insurance Corporation, 2010 BCSC 1536, a claim for insurance coverage related to a furnace fuel spill that damaged the plaintiff’s recreational home. In dismissing the lawsuit with costs, the Court adopted wholesale the defendant’s arguments concerning policy interpretation, the doctrine of reasonable expectations and the pollution exclusion. The link to the case is http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/10/15/2010BCSC1536.htm.
Related Content
Clark Wilson acts for Pure Multi-Family REIT LP in closing US$39.1 million bought deal
Clark Wilson acted for Pure Multi-Family REIT LP (Pure) (TSXV: RUF.U, RUF.UN, RUF.DB.U; OTCQX: PMULF) in closing its bought deal public offering of 7,250,000 Class ... Continued
Differences between the Oppression Remedy and Derivative Actions
The Ontario Court of Appeal (the “Court”) recently provided much needed guidance on the distinction between the oppression remedy and derivative actions. While both claims ... Continued
